Optimal crisis interventions in an open economy with credit constraint

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Borradores de Economía; No. 989

Date published

2017-03-27

Date

2018-02-15

Part of book title

ISSN

ISBN

Document language

eng
Metrics
downloads: 0
abstract_views: 0

Ver PlumX Metrics

Las opiniones contenidas en el presente documento son responsabilidad exclusiva de los autores y no comprometen al Banco de la República ni a su Junta Directiva.

The opinions contained in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not commit Banco de la República or its Board of Directors.

Abstract

In an open-economy model with collateral constraint, Schmitt-Grohé and Uribe (2016) propose a procyclical policy (it calls for capital controls that are higher during crises than during normal times) that supposedly solves the externality problem that results from the underestimation of the social costs of decentralized debt decisions. We show that such policy does not solve the problem and recall that previous literature has established that a countercyclical tax on debt (positive during normal times and nil during crisis) does. We also show that the externality problem can be solved as well by a countercyclical subsidy on consumption (positive during crises and zero in normal times). The latter result, however, is not a robust policy recommendation because it is not a solution if we remove the assumption that lenders overlook the effect of lump-sum taxes on borrowing capacity.

Description

Temática

Citation


Seleccionar año de consulta:

Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0.

Este documento ha sido depositado por parte de el(los) autor(es) bajo la siguiente constancia de depósito